More SAP power.
Register now for free and receive smart tips on output management, SAP forms, customizing, webinars, and more once a month!
The e-invoicing requirement in 2026 is more than just a challenge—it is an opportunity to automate SAP processes, reduce costs, and ensure compliance.
Electronic invoicing is no longer an isolated IT issue in the SAP environment. What started out as a local project is now developing into a permanent, global obligation. Countries such as Poland are already live, France is following suit, and other countries have announced or specified their legal requirements.
For IT managers, SAP administrators, and decision-makers, the question is no longer whether e-invoicing needs to be implemented, but how. In particular, choosing the right e-invoicing service provider in the SAP context determines whether the invoicing process remains stable, legally compliant, and scalable in the long term—or whether new dependencies and additional technical effort arise.
This article provides a technical overview of the costs involved in selecting a service provider, what companies can expect during implementation, and how SAP standard solutions compare to global e-invoice approaches. The aim is to provide guidance, not to advertise.
The introduction of e-billing is initially viewed as a regulatory project in many companies. A country introduces a requirement, a solution is implemented, and the project is completed. In practice, however, it quickly becomes apparent that this approach is no longer viable.
Legal requirements change regularly. New countries are added, existing specifications are adapted, and technical formats are further developed. For internationally active companies, this means that the e-invoicing process is not a one-time project, but rather an ongoing process.
In addition, requirements vary greatly. While some countries rely on established formats and networks, others define very specific platforms, transmission channels, or validation rules. For SAP system landscapes, this quickly leads to increasing complexity.
IT management and SAP teams in particular are faced with the task of implementing regulatory requirements without overloading their own system architecture or jeopardizing the clean core.
Finding a suitable e-invoicing service provider for SAP is rarely a trivial matter. At first glance, many providers offer similar services. However, upon closer inspection, there are significant differences.
A key issue is whether a service provider merely provides technical interfaces or whether it also offers specialist expertise on country-specific requirements. E-invoicing is not just a format issue, but always a compliance issue as well.
Many companies also underestimate the long-term implications of their choice of service provider. A solution that works well for a single country can quickly prove to be a dead end when expanded to other countries.
There are also internal aspects to consider: dependencies on certain technologies, additional maintenance work in the SAP system, or necessary in-house developments have a direct impact on operating costs and resource planning.
Regardless of which approach a company chooses, the introduction of an e-invoicing solution in the SAP environment involves several areas of expenditure.
The first step is the analysis phase. This involves not only technical issues, but also organizational aspects: Which countries are affected? What types of invoices are sent? What processes are involved?
This is followed by implementation. This includes technical integration, customization, test scenarios, and coordination with specialist departments. The testing effort increases significantly, especially when it comes to country-specific requirements.
The work does not end after go-live. Legal changes, new formats, or additional countries require ongoing adjustments. Depending on the solution approach, this may involve regular development work or manual interventions in the SAP system.
For IT teams, it is particularly relevant how much responsibility they have to take on in the long term—for example, in monitoring, error analysis, or maintaining mapping tables.
SAP offers its own components and frameworks for mapping e-invoicing requirements. These approaches are an obvious choice for many companies, as they can be integrated into the existing SAP landscape.
The SAP standard covers basic requirements and offers a certain proximity to the core architecture. For companies with few countries or manageable requirements, this can be a viable option.
In practice, however, it has been shown that the implementation and maintenance costs vary greatly. Country-specific adjustments, IDoc extensions, or the import of notes can lead to recurring costs.
From a clean core perspective, the extent to which individual adjustments are necessary is crucial. The more in-house developments or specific enhancements are required, the greater the risk of limiting the system’s upgradeability.
Global e-invoice solutions take a different approach. The aim is to bundle country-specific requirements outside the SAP core and operate them centrally.
In such architectures, the SAP system primarily functions as a data supplier. The actual processing, validation, transfer, and archiving take place on a specialized platform.
One advantage of this approach is decoupling. Legal changes or new countries can be implemented without having to adapt the SAP system itself.
For IT management and SAP administrators, it is particularly important that the clean core is preserved. In many cases, transports, custom code, or extensive modifications can be avoided.
A direct comparison between SAP standard approaches and global e-invoice solutions is useful, but should always be made in context.
When it comes to implementation costs, SAP standard solutions are often easy to plan initially, but the costs increase as the number of countries involved rises. Global solutions also require initial integration, but are usually easier to scale.
In operation, the approaches differ primarily in terms of maintenance requirements. While SAP standard solutions often require internal expertise and regular adjustments, global platforms take care of many of these tasks centrally.
In terms of scalability, global approaches offer advantages if additional countries are to be connected at short notice. With Clean Core, much depends on the specific implementation, but decoupled architectures have an advantage here.
Regardless of the approach chosen, companies should consider several criteria when selecting an e-invoicing service provider for SAP.
This includes technical integration as well as a professional understanding of legal requirements. Transparency in operations, clean monitoring, and clear responsibilities are further key points.
The long-term perspective also plays a role. A solution should not only meet current requirements, but also enable future expansions.
It is also important for decision-makers that costs, expenses, and responsibilities are clearly defined. Unclear responsibilities often lead to friction losses in operations.
Choosing an e-invoicing service provider in the SAP environment is a strategic decision. It affects not only compliance, but also the stability and future viability of the IT landscape.
Companies should take the time to analyze requirements thoroughly and evaluate different approaches realistically. A neutral assessment helps to avoid long-term risks.
Many of the issues raised here are best clarified through open discussion. That is precisely what the Fireside Chat “E-Invoicing” is all about.
In this format, we discuss in a practical manner what efforts companies can expect when selecting service providers, how SAP standard solutions can be classified, and what really matters when it comes to global e-invoicing approaches.
The fireside chat is aimed specifically at IT managers, SAP managers, and decision-makers who are faced with the challenge of implementing e-invoicing in a legally compliant and scalable manner.
Participation is free of charge. All information on registration can be found on the event page.
E-invoicing will be mandatory in Germany from 2025. From 2026 for Poland and Belgium, for example. Companies must ensure that they send invoices in a legally compliant, digital and standard-compliant manner (e.g. XRechnung, ZUGFeRD). For SAP systems, this means that processes must be modernized and automated.
Legal compliance and transparency, international coverage, integration in SAP, automation and a clear reduction in the workload of internal IT are important. A provider should also have experience in SAP output management and offer a future-proof solution.
With a SaaS solution, companies benefit from predictable costs, automatic updates and high scalability. This not only reduces investment risks, but also prevents additional work caused by manual processes or incorrect implementations.
In-house development is often time-consuming, expensive and ties up internal SAP resources. Maintenance, updates in the event of legal changes and international requirements can quickly become cost traps and may not be presented transparently.
A managed SaaS service provides an all-round carefree package: clean core is maintained, archiving is automatic, updates run without SAP transports and the system remains low-maintenance. Companies save development costs and reduce the workload on their SAP team.
With Global E-Invoice Cloud, Softway AG offers a ready-to-use, cloud-based solution for international e-invoicing from SAP. It is legally compliant, automatically archived, reduces the workload on IT teams, and fulfills e-invoicing requirements based on the principle: SAP output – cleverly solved.
You are currently viewing a placeholder content from HubSpot. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently seeing a placeholder content of HubSpot Meetings. To access the actual content, click on the button below. Please note that data will be passed on to third-party providers.
Further information